Submitted by Jon Stahl (not verified) on September 23, 2009 - 10:56am.

Philip: "If that’s the case, then traditional publishers are swimming in a sea of meaningless metrics when it comes to looking at their online “reach,” “engagement,” and so on."

Me: Yes, exactly! We are being beguiled by numerosity without significance. And unfortunately, the latest generation of social media tools seem to be leading us to an ever-shallower stats obsession.

Personally, when I look at content-centric site stats, I'm interested in page views + visits, RSS subscribers (if there is a full-text feed, otherwise, engagement (reading) only shows up in page views), email clickthroughs, comment volume, inbound links.

I think that inbound referrals from facebook, twitter, etc are interesting to track.

HTH.

Reply

Please solve the math problem above and type in the result. e.g. for 1+1, type 2
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options

Blog categories