Our "Left Coast" friends over at Groundwire (formerly ONE/Northwest) have just posted a great roundup of events in 2010 that any self-respecting "technologist for good" should check out.

There are a lot of conferences on that list that are new to me, so I'm looking forward to digging into the agendas and asking for feedback from folks that have attended in the past.

There are a few events not on Groundwire's list that caught my eye this year. I provide them with the caveat that I haven't personally attended these, and most haven't announce follow-up events yet. Here's to hoping they do:

• Tide's Momentum conference
• Fairsay's eCampaigning Forum in Oxford
• Journalism That Matters
• Organizing 2.0
• A local "Ignite" events
• And, finally, any one of the great events that are run by Aspiration Technology Foundation ever year

There are more, but I'll leave it there.

Know of others? Post a comment over at Groundwire.

Still cleaning out my inbox from a couple weeks on the road (and a few hectic weeks in general!) and ran across these goodies…

The Social Entrepreneurship Summit that was held on Dec 3-4, 2007 at the Centre for Social Innovation and the MaRS Collaboration Centre has posted the event proceedings online. Sounds like they’ve received some good feedback on the event, and there’s momentum to keep it moving forward.

Over the last couple of weeks, I was thinking a lot about “network leadership,” and the role of innovative technology, and how it all becomes part of a movement here in Canada that could change the field of innovation. The last burning question for me is: How can Canadian grant makers play a bigger role in catalyzing the necessary networks, and helping innovators build the necessary relationships?

Lots has already been said about the opportunities for a more holistic approach to financing non-profit technology initiatives. So, when it comes time to explore new ways of financing social innovation, I hope that foundations and grant makers will invest some time to integrate the “old” ideas too. But, when I return to the question “how can Canadian grant makers play a bigger role in ensuring that technology projects are successful and sustainable,” I always come back to the same conclusion: the funding model needs to be innovative too.

One of the questions that I’ve struggled with over the last couple of years is: What systemic changes are necessary to help catalyze innovation around social technology? I came back to this question the other week as the conversation swayed toward the opportunity for progressive organizations — and social innovators — to integrate social software, social networks, and the ideas of Web 2.0 into their work. I think for most of us who work in the non-profit technology space, the sparkle is off the Web 2.0 starburst, as we see organizations struggle to fully “get” what this new technology movement is all about.

What I do think is cool about Web 2.0 — especially when it comes to non-profit organizations and social innovators — is the operational style (business model if you must). Having a usable, interactive, data-exposing, read/write Web site is, in my opinion, more a function of a new approach to problem solving than a tectonic shift in the way the underlying technology works.

Photo of Kirsten Jordan (Taking IT Global) and Andres Dussan (Askoka) by Michael Lewkowitz

How often have you sought to answer questions like “how can new technologies support social change that has impact, durability and scale?” or “is it possible to foster collaboration, sharing, and even co-development of technology solutions rather than everyone building their own or working in isolation?” Well, last week, I was surprised to find myself in a room with some of Canada’s brightest minds when it comes to social innovation and social technology (that is: technology in support of social innovation). We gathered early in the morning on July 26th at MaRS to do some brainstorming on how best to support innovative organizations to leverage appropriate technology, execute technology projects successfully, and how to build capacity for ongoing innovation and sustainable technology operations.

It’s totally inspiring to see someone like Steven Clift — a person dedicated and passionate about the possibility of more accessible global democracies — be recognized by an organization like Ashoka. He writes:

The Ashoka fellowship will allow me to dedicate myself full-time to E-Democracy.Org for at least the next three years - no more subsidizing my passion with my often exhausting consulting work while trying to juggle the wonderful obligations of a new father and husband.